AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Intel desktop board core i3 drivers4/16/2023 ![]() One reason is that clock frequencies are much lower, by roughly 500 MHz compared to the Core i5-10600K and almost 1 GHz compared to the Core i9-10900K. ![]() Power efficiency of the Core i3-10100 is much better than with other Comet Lake processors we've tested. This means it operates in a narrow band between 4.1 and 4.2 GHz most of the time. While its base clock is rated at 3.6 GHz, it stayed at or above 4.1 GHz in our frequency testing with even all cores active and AVX. On a positive note, the Core i3-10100 holds its boost frequencies very well. AMD faced serious social media drama over their Zen 2 processors not reaching promised boost clocks, let's see if Intel users will be just as demanding. Obviously, the CPU can handle 4.3 GHz single-core stable all day or Intel wouldn't have binned it to be a Core i3-10100, so it seems there's some headroom for Intel to refine their algorithms. There's probably some sort of observer effect at play, too, due to monitoring software creating a little bit of extra load on the processor. With AVX we couldn't measure it to be active at all. While the CPU is marketed with "up to" 4.3 GHz boost, our testing shows that this frequency is rarely active, even at single-threaded workloads. Just like in all our CPU reviews, we measured the maximum boost clocks of the Core i3-10100, and I have to say I'm a little bit disappointed. AMD's Ryzen 3 3300X is a strong alternative though, especially if you are looking for a more balanced mix between application performance and games and want to save a buck or two. If you absolutely want to future-proof, a six-core CPU for gaming could be the better choice, but for now, a 4-core/8-thread processor is perfectly sufficient and the wiser investment. ![]() That's why it's a good idea to save as much as possible on the processor, which frees up budget to buy a faster GPU. The differences are really small when it comes to gaming though, especially at higher resolutions like 1440p and 4K, because the bottleneck shifts to the graphics card and the CPU no longer is the limiting factor. Against AMD Ryzen it does even better, basically matches the Ryzen 5 3600X, and is just a few percentage points behind the Ryzen 9 3900X. It trades blows with last generation's Core i5 models and is 10% faster at 1080p than the Core i3-9100F. When it comes to gaming, the Core i3-10100 does fine. For the general consumer who browses the Internet and uses Office, or conducts other such tasks, the Core i3-10100 is perfectly sufficient. Now, if you are rendering or encoding video all day, you should of course definitely look at a stronger processor, especially when you make more money the shorter your wait. Overall, the Core i3-10100 offers very decent performance for applications that often rivals that of the more powerful last-generation Ryzen 5/Core i5 models. We reviewed the Core i5-10400F last week thanks to its six-core/twelve-thread design, it is 22% faster than the Core i3-10100. AMD's Ryzen 3 3300X beats the Core i3-10100 by around 9%, and the much more affordable Ryis only 3% behind. With a 17% lead, the difference is significant, higher than what we got in previous releases, generation over generation. While Intel increased 元 cache sizes across the board for Comet Lake, Core i3-10100 wasn't so lucky-its 元 cache has been left at 6 MB, same as the Core i3-9100, and TDP remains at 65 W as well, which is as expected.Īveraged over our mix of single/low and multi-threaded applications, the Core i3-10100 shows large gains over the Core i3-9100F. This alone will bring a substantial performance improvement over the Core i3-9100. This is why the Core i3-10100 in this review has HyperThreading enabled. To achieve any sort of competitiveness, Intel had to rethink their policy of reserving HyperThreading to their top SKUs only. The new AMD SKUs also made life difficult for the Core i3-9100, which was a great value option until then, mostly for businesses and consumers who weren't primarily gamers. Suddenly, you could get decent performance with minimal investment in both games and applications. Just a few weeks ago, AMD released their Ryand 3300X processors, which breathed life into the entry-level segment of around $100.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |